Mountain States Legal Foundation Logo

Archived Cases

Archived: All Cases

Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar

Legal Question:

Whether the listing or delisting of a species may be limited to only those portions of the species' range in which the species requires protection?

Plaintiff:

WildEarth Guardians

Defendant:

Ken Salazar, U.S. Secretary of the Interior

Amicus Curiae:

Arizona Cattle Growers' Association and New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
None.

On February 5, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a 12-month finding regarding the petition to list the Gunnison's prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) as a threatened or endangered species. In its determination, the FWS found that the species was not endangered or threatened throughout all of its range. It also found, however, that the portion of the current range of the species in central and south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico represents a significant portion of the range where the species warrants listing, but that listing is precluded by higher priority actions. Thus, the FWS found that listing is not warranted in the "prairie" range of the species and is warranted but precluded in the "montane" portion of its range.

On March 24, 2009, WildEarth Guardians filed suit challenging FWS's listing determination. Specifically, WildEarth Guardians challenged the FWS's decision to limit listing to only the montane portion of the Gunnison's prairie dog's range and the FWS's "warranted but precluded" finding with respect to the montane portion of the species' range. As in other cases, the FWS relied heavily upon a 2007 Solicitor's Opinion that authorizes the FWS to list a species in only that portion of its range in which protections are necessary.

On October 9, 2009, MSLF filed its motion to intervene on behalf of the Arizona Cattle Growers' Association and New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association. That motion was denied on November 25, 2009. On November 25, 2009, the district court granted the Cattle Growers' Associations permission to file an amicus brief. The Cattle Growers Associations filed their amicus brief on December 16, 2009, and briefing on cross-motions for summary judgment was completed.

On December 16, 2009, the federal defendants filed their opposition to WildEarth Guardians' motion and their cross-motion for summary judgment. On September 8, 2010, the federal defendants filed a motion to stay the proceedings until October 14, 2010, following the ruling by the Montana federal district court in Defenders of Wildlife that the Solicitor's Opinion regarding distinct population segments is contrary to the plain language of the ESA and thus unlawful. On September 30, 2010, the district court denied the motion for stay and granted WildEarth Guardians' motion for summary judgment, set aside the government's Gunnison's prairie dog finding, and remanded the matter to the agency. Meanwhile, on March 1, 2011, the district court approved a stipulation under which the federal defendants agreed to pay WildEarth Guardians $47,530 in attorney fees. On November 19, 2010, the FWS filed a notice of appeal. On March 4, 2011, the new Solicitor withdrew the Solicitor's Opinion upon which the challenged listing determination was based.

  • Energy Group Wins In New Mexico Ozone Lawsuit

    Aug 3, 2011
    DENVER, CO. A New Mexico nonprofit entity that defends the interests of independent oil and natural gas producers, their employees, and service companies, today won a challenge by environmental groups to 92 federal oil and gas leases issued in New Mexico in 2008 when a New Mexico federal district c
  • Federal Court: Prairie Dogs Belong On Endangered List

    Sep 30, 2010
    DENVER, CO. Despite arguments by two large agricultural groups whose members' ability to earn livelihoods and use their private property will be affected adversely by designation of a species of prairie dog as eligible for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), an Arizona federal d
  • Energy Group Urges Dismissal Of Enviro Groups’ Lawsuit

    Aug 16, 2010
    DENVER, CO. A New Mexico nonprofit entity that defends the interests of independent oil and natural gas producers, their employees, and service companies today urged a New Mexico federal district court to dismiss a lawsuit filed by environmental groups that challenges 34 federal oil and gas leases


Help protect constitutional liberties and private property rights, and promote limited and ethical government and the free enterprise system:

Donate Here