MissionLegal CasesThe LitigatorAction Update Mountain States Legal Foundation
MSLF Board
MSLF StaffLinksReturn to Home Page
Public AppearancesContact UsContribute
Press ReleasesLegal AssistanceSummary JudgmentPlanned Giving

Go to Legal Cases Home Page

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Texas
Issue: Whether the United States may engage in racially discriminatory contracting in its procurement and contracting practices?

Plaintiff: Rothe Development Corporation

Defendants: U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of the Air Force

Amicus Curiae: Mountain States Legal Foundation

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (No. 2008-1017)

Status: On November 4, 2008, the Federal Circuit panel held that Section 1207 as enacted in 2006 is unconstitutional in that it fails strict scrutiny and it remanded the case to the Claims Court for entry of judgment.

Next Event: None

History: Rothe Corporation is a woman-owned and -controlled consortium of businesses based in San Antonio, Texas. Since 1987, Rothe has contracted with the Air Force to maintain, operate, and repair the computer systems at Columbus Air Force Base in Mississippi. It bid on another such contract in 1997, and, although Rothe’s was the low bid, the contract was awarded to Rothe’s chief competitor, a Korean-owned business, because of the Department of Defense’s “Section 1207 program,” which includes a racial preference or quota.

In November 1998, Rothe challenged the constitutionality of the Section 12 program. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled for Rothe in August 2001. The case was remanded for a factual determination regarding Congress’s reauthorization of the program. In July 2004, the trial court ruled against Rothe. After the Federal Circuit, in June 2005, reversed, the trial court ruled again, on August 10, 2007, against Rothe. Rothe again appealed to the Federal Circuit.

The rulings in favor of Rothe have been based on the Supreme Court’s 1994 ruling in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peňa, a case litigated by MSLF. The rulings against Rothe have relied on decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in two challenges to race-based contracting that were not reviewed and reversed by the Supreme Court.

On December 14, 2007, MSLF filed its friend of the court brief in support of Rothe Development Corporation. Oral arguments were held on September 2, 2008.




Copyright - Mountain States Legal Foundation 1999 [Privacy Statement]
2596 South Lewis Way
Lakewood, Colorado 80227
[View County Map]  [View Local Map]
(303) 292-2021 or By E-mail

Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF) is a nonprofit, public interest law firm dedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property, limited and ethical government, and free enterprise system. It is an Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3) entity incorporated in the State of Colorado. Contributions to Mountain States Legal Foundation are tax deductible.
MSLF's tax-identification number is 84-0736725

[Mission] [Press Releases] [Legal Cases] [Legal Assistance ]
[Contribute to MSLF] [The Litigator] [Action Updates] [Summary Judgment]
[Join MSLF's Email List] [Planned Giving]
[MSLF Board] [MSLF Staff] [Links] [Contact MSLF]
[Public Appearances] [Return to Home Page]